User Contributed Dictionary
Pronunciation
Noun
rights- Plural of right; things one is entitled to do, in political philosophy.
Translations
- Swedish: rättigheter
Extensive Definition
In the jurisprudence and the law, a right is the
legal or moral entitlement to do or refrain
from doing something, or to obtain or refrain from obtaining an
action, thing or recognition in civil
society. Rights serve as rules of interaction between people,
and, as such, they place constraints and obligations upon the
actions of individuals or groups (for example, if one has a
right
to life, this means that others do not have the liberty to kill
him).
Most modern conceptions of rights are universalist and egalitarian — in other
words, equal rights
are granted to all people. There are two main modern conceptions of
rights: on the one hand, the idea of natural
rights holds that there is a certain list of rights enshrined
in nature that cannot be legitimately modified by any human power.
On the other hand, the idea of legal rights
holds that rights are human constructs, created by society,
enforced by governments and subject to change.
By contrast, most pre-modern conceptions of
rights were hierarchical, with different
people being granted different rights, and some having more rights
than others. For instance, the rights of a father to be respected
by his son did not indicate a duty upon the father to return that
respect, and the divine
right of kings to hold absolute power over their subjects did
not leave room for many rights to be granted to the subjects
themselves. The concept of natural right developed in the School
of Salamanca in the late 16th century, and first gained
widespread acceptance nearly 200 years later, during the Age of
Enlightenment.
It is not generally considered necessary that a
right should be understood by the holder of that right; thus rights
may be recognized on behalf of another, such as children's
rights or the rights of people declared mentally incompetent to
understand their rights. However, rights must be understood by
someone in order to have legal existence, so the understanding of
rights is a social prerequisite for the existence of rights.
Therefore, educational opportunities within society have a close
bearing upon the people's ability to erect adequate rights
structures.
There are two fundamental controversies
surrounding the notion of rights: First, there is the question of
the basis for rights (on what basis rights can be said to exist).
Second, there is the question of the content of rights (what the
rights of a person actually are).
Types of rights
In modern English and European systems of
jurisprudence and law, a right is the legal or moral entitlement to
do or refrain from doing something or to obtain or refrain from
obtaining an action, thing or recognition in civil society. Compare
with duty, referring to behaviour that is expected or required of
the person, and with privilege, referring to something that can be
conferred and revoked.
The specific enumeration of rights accorded to
people has historically differed greatly from one century to the
next, and from one regime to the next, but nowadays is normally
addressed by the constitutions of the respective nations. Generally
speaking (within the English and European systems) a right
corresponds with a complementary obligation that others have on the
same object or realm; for instance, if someone has a right to
something, simultaneously another party or parties have an
obligation to do something (or to abstain from doing something) in
order to respect that right or to give concrete execution to that
right to be(...).
Property rights
provide a good example: society recognizes that individuals have
title to particular property as defined by the transaction by which
they acquired the property granting the individual free use and
possession of the property. In many cases, especially regarding
ideological and similar rights, the obligation depends on the legal
system in its entirety, or on the state, or on the generical
universality of other subjects submitted to the law.
Societal rights or civil rights
are bestowed to its citizenry by society and are a set of
obligations that are purported as a social
contract. Societal rights are a privilege of membership and the
benefits are limited to its members though may be extended to
temporary guests. Access to societal rights is dependent on
government grants and on the citizen fulfilling their obligations
e.g. complying with laws and paying taxes.
The right can therefore be a faculty of doing
something, of omitting or refusing to do something or of claiming
something. Some interpretations express a typical form of right in
the faculty of using something, and this is more often related to
the right of ownership of property. The faculty (in all the above
mentioned senses) can be originated by a (generical or specific)
law, or by a private contract (which is sometimes
exactly defined as a specific law between or among volunteer
parties).
Other interpretations consider the right as a
sort of freedom of something or as the object of justice. One of
the definitions of justice is in fact the obligation that the legal
system has toward the individual or toward the collectivity to
grant respect or execution to his/her/its right, ordinarily with no
need of explicit claim.
Aristotle, in the
Nicomachean
Ethics (book five), claims that there is a large difference
between written (generalized) justice and what is actually right
for the (specific) individual.
But what obscures the matter
is that though what is equitable is just, it is not identical with,
but a correction of, that which is just according to
law.
The reason of this is that
every law is laid down in general terms, while there are matters
about which it is impossible to speak correctly in general terms.
Where, then, it is necessary to speak in general terms, but
impossible to do so correctly, the legislator lays down that which
holds good for the majority of cases, being quite aware that it
does not hold good for all.
The law, indeed, is none the
less correctly laid down because of this defect; for the defect
lies not in the law, nor in the lawgiver, but in the nature of the
subject-matter, being necessarily involved in the very conditions
of human action.Aristotle|The Nicomachean
Ethics (10-3) (Peters' translation)
Rights can be divided into individual
rights, which are held by individuals (or corporations) recognised by
the legal system, and collective
rights, which are held by an ensemble of people or a subgroup
of people who have a certain characteristic in common. In some
cases there can be an amount of tension between individual and
collective rights. In other cases, the view of collective and
individual rights held by one group can come into sharp and bitter
conflict with the view of rights held by another group. For
instance compare Manifest
destiny with Trail of
Tears.
With reference to the object of the right, a
common general distinction is among:
- Intellectual rights, which include:
Important documents
- Magna Carta (1215; England)
- Bill
of Rights 1689 (England)
- Declared that Englishmen, as embodied by Parliament, possess certain civil and political rights that can not be taken away.
-
Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789;
France)
- One of the fundamental documents of the French Revolution, defining a set of individual rights and collective rights of the people.
-
United States Bill of Rights (1789/1791)
- The first ten amendments of the United States Constitution.
-
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)
- An over-arching set of standards by which Governments, organisations and individuals would measure their behaviour towards each other. The preamble declares that the
- "...recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world..."
- Other general Declarations from the UN have followed, notably the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, 1989 http://www.unicef.org/crc/crc.htm.
-
European Convention on Human Rights (1950)
- Adopted under the auspices of the Council of Europe to protect human rights and fundamental freedoms.
-
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1982)
- Its purpose is to protect rights of Canadian citizens from actions and policies of all levels of government.
- Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2000)
See also
- Animal rights
- Bill of rights
- Civil rights
- Claim (patent)
- Contractual rights
- Droit
- Duty
- Equal rights
- Exclusive rights
- Fathers rights
- Freedom
- Freedom of religion
- Freedom of speech
- Freedom of the press
- Fundamental Laws of England
- Gay rights
- Human rights
- Jurisprudence
- Law
- Law of obligations
- Legal rights
- Men's Rights
- Natural rights
- Negative and positive rights
- Rite
- Roman Law
- Social contract
- Hohfeld, Wesley N.
- Women's Rights
References
External links
rights in Arabic: صح
rights in Aragonese: Dreito
rights in Czech: Právo
rights in Danish: Rettighed
rights in German: Recht
rights in Modern Greek (1453-): Δικαίωμα
rights in Spanish: Derecho subjetivo
rights in Esperanto: Juro
rights in Persian: حقوق (قانونی)
rights in French: Droit subjectif
rights in Korean: 권리
rights in Italian: Diritto
rights in Hebrew: זכות
rights in Kirghiz: Hukuk
rights in Latin: Ius
rights in Dutch: Recht
rights in Japanese: 権利
rights in Uighur: ئوڭ
rights in Polish: Prawo
rights in Portuguese: Direito subjectivo
rights in Romanian: Drept
rights in Russian: субъективное право
rights in Simple English: Rights
rights in Swedish: Lag
rights in Thai: สิทธิ
rights in Turkish: Hak
rights in Chinese: 权利